| Database: PFC_ID: Apache Sitgreaves NF: District: Topographic Quad1: Topographic Quad2: Topographic Quad3: Riparian-Wetland Area Name: Date: ID Team Observers: HUC5: Miles: Area Name: Flight Line: , Photo No: , Photo Year: PFC Reach Number: Stream Name: Stream Type: Riparian Width (in feet): |
MySQL 1502000101_Nutrioso_Creek_1_05/10/2005 Alpine RD Nutrioso, 281NW, H233109 EC Bar Ranch Reach 1 October 5, 2005 Tom Subirge, Jim Crosswhite Nutrioso Creek 0.36 EC Bar Ranch Reach 1 1 Nutrioso Creek Perennial 45 |
| Riparian Species List: Alder, shiny willow, Nebraska sedge,
bulrush, wheatgrass, globe mallow, water hemlock, hair grass, clover, strapleaf
willow, coyote willow, cinquefoil Upland Species List: Agropyron spicatum, Chna, Bogr, Skunkbush, Geca, Roar |
Location
Location Description: Reach
Downstream
End Point
Township Range Section:
Meridian: Gila & Salt River Base Line
Township: 7N, Range:
30E, Section: 29, 1/4: NW, 1/4 1/4: SE
UTM: Zone:12S
Northing: meters,
Easting: meters
Lat / Long:
North Latitude: Degrees: , Decimal Minutes:
West Longitude: Degrees: , Decimal Minutes:
Upstream
End Point
Township Range Section:
Meridian: Gila & Salt River Base Line
Township:7N, Range:30E,
Section: 29, 1/4: NW, 1/4 1/4: SE
UTM: Zone:12S
Northing: meters,
Easting: meters
Lat / Long:
North Latitude: Degrees: , Decimal Minutes:
West Longitude: Degrees: , Decimal Minutes:
HYDROLOGIC
1) Floodplain inundated in "relatively frequent"
events (1-3 years) YES
Remarks: Floodplain
adequate for 1-3 yr events, but too narrow for higher stream flow events, G
Channel has narrow Flood Plain, Flood Plain is building up, sediments are being
stabilized by vegetation.
2) Active/stable beaver dams YES
Remarks: Beaver dam
present and signs of freshly cut branches.
3) Sinuosity, width/depth ration, and gradient are in
balance with the landscape setting (i.e., landform, geology, and bioclimatic
region) NO
Remarks: G Channel
(gully); not sinuous enough, too straight, width/depth of channel is good,
start of Flood Plain formation.
Gradient could be lower with more sinuosity.
4) Riparian zone is widening or has achieved potiential
extent YES
Remarks: Reached
potential under current conditions, Flood Plain vegetated, narrow channel in
most places with vegetation crowding both sides of channel. Widening still
occurring as high terraces erode and provide wider Flood Plain. Flood plain may
have been several hundred feet in width before system incised.
5) Upland watershed not contributin to riparian
degradation YES
Remarks: Upland
watershed fairly stable but Datil formation is highly erosive - is cause of
high sediment load. Datil is volcanic
ash, comprises valley-fill alluvium.
Common old logging roads in upper watershed, grown over, increasing
subdivisions and roads threaten stability, year-round grazing upstream (Macky
Tricky) on adjacent private land. Current conditions may not be at or above
threshold conditions that trigger unraveling of riparian area, but it might be
getting close.
VEGETATIVE
6) Diverse age-class distribution (recruitment for
maintenance/recovery YES
Remarks: Mostly
herbaceous species, seem to be spreading onto new deposits, considered
"diverse age class." . Alder
etc. woody species mostly in younger age class, although some plants have dead
tops. This species of alder doesn't get very old. Most willows of young age
class, few old.
7) Diverse composition of vegetation (for
maintenance/recovery YES
Remarks: Good
diversity of right kind. At least a dozen species comprise herbaceous community
type. Diverse woody species, but not extremely abundant. System is trending
toward wet meadow type.
8) Species present indicate maintenance of riparian soil
moisture characteristics YES
Remarks: Herbaceous
community made up of facultative wetland and obligate wetland species.
9) Streambank vegetation is comprised of those plants or
plant communities that have root masses capable of withstanding high streamflow
events YES
Remarks: Abundant
sedges, rushes, facultative wetland grasses.
10) Riparian plants exhibit high vigor YES
Remarks: Extremely
good growth.
11) Adequate vegetative cover present to protect banks and
dissipate energy during high flows YES
Remarks: Good woody
component adequate for a 10-15 yr event, however higher flows (i.e. 25+cfs) may
result in damage.
12) Plant communities in the riparian area are an adequate
source of coarse and/or large woody debris
YES
Remarks: Fine-grained
system depends on floodplain width more than woody vegetation. Good herbaceous ground cover 100%.
SOILS
13) Floodplain and channel characteristics (i.e., rocks,
overflow channels, coarse and/or large woody debris) adequate to dissipate
energy YES
Remarks: Adequate
for normal flows, signs of deposition indicate adequate energy dissipation
under current flow events.
14) Point bars are revegetating NOT APPLICABLE
Remarks: G Channel,
no point bars but deposition is occurring in places, some mid-channel bars,
some deposition on adjacent flood plain area.
15) Lateral stream movement is associated with natural
sinuosity YES
Remarks: Rosgen G
Channel, indicates "gully" configuration which is very straight, but
system trying to meander with deposition and additional cutting of vertical
banks. Alder may die with deposition on floodplain.
16) System is vertically stable YES
Remarks: No head
cuts, system is slowly aggrading and widening.
17) Stream is in balance with the water and sediment being
supplied by the watershed (i.e., no excessive erosion or deposition) YES
Remarks: Signs of
deposition evident, but stream handles sediment load with adequate vegetation
growth and establishment, channel is slightly meandering. It appears the
protected stream reaches are depositing and holding nearly all of the available
bed load. Good trend!
Vegetation Community Types:
Upland: Pied/Jude2/Jumo
Wetland:
Summary Determination
Functional Rating:
FAR
Trend for Functional -- At Risk: Upward
Are factors contributing to unacceptable conditions
outside agency's control or management? Y
If yes, what are those factors? Flow Regulations, Other,
Problem(s): Nutrioso Creek is regulated for irrigation purposes. Floodplain width inadequate for higher flow events, G Channel, sinuosity inadequate, it is trying to become wet meadow rather than lotic woody species dominated system. The Nutrioso area has low gradient across historic flood plain, and fluvial deposits are very fine, both indicating more lentic than lotic habitat.
Recommendations: None - good recovery rate; appears to be as
fast as possible.
NOTES:
Gravel in stream bank evidence of historic higher velocity/gradient in limited
stream segments. Sedge/rush community on floodplain lays down after flooding.
Photos:
TS: 16,17,18,19,20 JC: 21. Total riparian acres in Reach
approximately 13.
NOTES:
re: creek water surface elevation measured from top of well casing. 18.33 ft
top of well casing to top of steel t-post in creek. This was surveyed by lazar
level for purposes of correlating creek water elevations with static water
table elevations in well.
Time to fix: 30+
Desired Functional Condition: 50 ft floodplain width minimum for
relatively frequent events, perhaps as wide as 100 ft would be desirable. This
is currently a Rosgen G channel (gully) which characteristically has no or
insufficient flood plain width.
Photographs: 5
Nutrioso Creek photos taken during PFC assessments
completed 10/5/2005
EC Bar Ranch area of Nutrioso Creek, Apache County, Arizona

Reach 1: #16-20
#16 - Upstream view of alders along creek-side. This may indicate higher
gradient, as alders typically grow in faster waters providing greater
oxygenation to its roots. Cobbly soil in banks also indicates this. Creeks
width/depth ratio is a bit too wide and shallow, and floodplain width is
insufficient, in spite of no evidence of peak flow damage. Narrower floodplain
may also indicate faster flows in steeper gradient reach. Good streamside
vegetation cover. Banks leading up to terrace are starting to revegetate,
reducing sediment influx to creek.

#17 - Upstream view of creek showing a fully vegetated mid-channel bar which indicates an abundance of sediment in bedload. In this case, mid-channel bars that are stabilized with vegetation help build floodplain width and encourage meander formation. Sediment stems from upstream sources, as well as vertical incised streambanks, that are in process of stabilizing. Note start of a floodplain being formed at creek side.

#18 - Downstream view of creek. Note ample and vigorous vegetation, however floodplain width is inadequate. Two terraces are visible. Creek is narrow during current flow stage, and showing subtle signs of meander formation.

#19 - Detail of channel with rushes growing in channel, and very fine organic sediment, which is settled out at bottom. As organic sediment is extremely light in weight, this indicates that nearly all sediment and bedload coming down the creek is being captured and built into a new floodplain.

#20 - Upstream view of a portion of this stream reach that has sufficient floodplain width. Note the dense sedge cover that lies down during flood flows to effectively protect floodplain sediments from mobilization and erosion. This dense mat of vegetation also helps conserve moisture during low flow periods.